ECONOMY OR SQUANDERONOMY?

Hi. It's time to look at Representative Paul Ryan's budget proposal, "The Path to Prosperity".

Representative Ryan answered President Obama's refusal to get rid of the economy ruining new health care bill with a proposal of his own. The Obama stooges are fighting this tooth and nail????????? Want to know why? Maybe because they have a welfare agenda that doesn't include SAVING MONEY only PRINTING MORE.

By the way, every time Obama gets the Treasury to PRINT MORE MONEY, it effectively REDUCES THE VALUE OF YOUR DOLLAR. So if a dollar was actually worth 100% (HA-HA-HA OR BOO HOO HOO!!!!!!!), it would effectively be reduced by the addition of more dollars. Say 100 cents FOR A DOLLAR reduced to sixty-five cents. That means you can only buy with that dollar 65% of what you bought before!!!!!!! Whoops, there goes the ice cream!!!!!! That's why the government wants us on a diet to lose weight!!!! As well as on a gas diet!!!!!! That's both for the car and the body.

Rep. Ryan, chairman of the House Budget Committee supposedly knows more about the Economy than the President, who doesn't seem to know a budget from a Budgie--THAT'S A BIRD FRIENDS--IN FACT TWO OF THEM!!!!!!!!!!

That's why Ryan chairs the BUDGET committee. EXPERTISE!!!!!!!!! REP. RYAN, who would like the American Republic to survive, recommends a STATE CONTROLLED BLOCK GRANT. It is the same path taken for the welfare reform in the 1990s. It is a program that allows greater flexibility and positive change. And is proven.

The program would transform Medicare into a plan with stated contribution similar to the plan of Congress and government employees. GOSH, WE GET TO HAVE AS NICE A PLAN AS CONGRESS?????????? Our SENIORS would get a direct SUBSIDY TO BUY INSURANCE (similar to the POPULAR PRESCRIPTION DRUG BENEFITS) AND INVOLVE SENIORS IN THE COST OF SERVICES.

Rep. Ryan also plugged various loopholes in his plan that closed out ETHANOL SUBSIDIES to lower tax rates without a loss of revenue. He also instructed that SPENDING BE FROZEN AT OR BELOW THE 2008 LEVEL for five years!!!!!!!

HOW BAD CAN ALL THIS BE??????????? To hear the Obama Progressives (remember, the new title for SOCIALIST-COMMUNIST BELIEFS) SCREAM IN AGONY "it is the path to poverty for America's seniors and children and a road to riches for big oil" (THAT I GUESS IS "as opposed to LITTLE Oil" whatever and wherever that is!)

AND GET THIS!!!!!!! ANYONE 55 and OLDER ARE ENTIRELY EXEMPT from Rep. Ryan's proposal. THERE WOULD BE NO CHANGE FOR CURRENT SENIORS!!!!!!!!!!!!

President Obama and his cohorts questioning this economic plan HAVE PASSED A MEDICARE PLAN THAT WILL THRUST THIS NATION INTO A MORASS OF DEBT AND ARE UNWILLING TO ADMIT IT NEEDS TO BE JETTISONED BECAUSE THEY WORKED SO HARD TO PASS IT!!!!!!!!!!!

GIVE ME A BREAK. THE BEST LAID PLANS OF MICE AND MEN REQUIRE RECONSTRUCTION!!!!!!!!!! What kind of IDIOTS lay out a plan (OBVIOUSLY FAULTY AND DISLIKED BY A MAJORITY OF AMERICANS) AND REFUSE TO ALTER IT??????????

Governor Rick Scott in the State of Florida ordered a cut in the budget for the disabled. When it was forcefully brought to his attention, the hardship this would cause, HE HAD THE GUTS TO WITHDRAW HIS RECOMMENDATION!!!!!!!!! Say what you will about Florida's new Governor, HE IS AT LEAST TUNED INTO HIS CONSTITUENTS which is more than you can say for PRESIDENT OBAMA, who has be BLINDSIDED BY HIS ADVISERS JUST AS HE WAS WHEN HE TOOK A 'SHELLACKING' IN THE 2010 ELECTION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

What was VP Joe Biden's answer to the Health Care issue? He told Americans to be patriotic and pay their fair share of the debt and not complain!!!!!!!Some pundit figured out that at present that FAIR SHARE was approximately $74,000. a year. More than many Americans even earn. GUESS OLD JOE'S BEEN WEALTHY TOO LONG!!!!!!!!!!!

So the important points in this proposal: NO CHANGE FOR 55 AND OLDER; STATE'S RIGHTS PROGRAM; PREPARATION TIME FOR NEW SENIORS AND A PROVEN CONGRESSIONAL PLAN (PRIVATE CHOICE INSTEAD OF PAYING FOR HEALTH CARE IN TAXES); A SAVING OF THE NATION'S BUDGET; AND A PLAN TO REDUCE SPENDING BY SETTING A 2008 LIMIT!!!!!!!!!!!!

What's the majority in the SENATE GOING TO DO?????????? MOAN???? OR BE ACTUALLY PROGRESSIVE AND PASS IT???????????? UNFORTUNATELY, the answer is too OBVIOUS and a real condemnation of the people running our Government.

One other little problem that needs airing. WHEN DID AMERICANS BECOME EXTREMISTS by HAVING A DIFFERENT OPINION THAN THE "ruling party". Liberal writers seem to feel that the Tea Party is a small minority. LOOK again MS CALABACH! There is always a vocal group of opposition representing a MUCH LARGER SEGMENT OF THE NATION, WHO MAY REMAIN SILENT but VOTE LOUDLY.

ONE OF THE WRITERS remarked he has "reason to feel terrified". TOO, TOO SAD. So does the VOCAL AND SILENT MAJORITY when they review the Government's "PROGRESSIVE IE: SOCIALIST-COMMUNIST PLANS" for America's future.

If that writer heard the shouts of the citizens on Washington's streets saying "Shut it Down" as dripping with contempt, perhaps he should review the policies of the Progressives that are being challenged with contempt because they are felt to be destroying our Republic and a government these citizens want to retain.

Perhaps it is time to stop the RHETORIC and ALLOW THE RIGHT OF FREE SPEECH for which our forefather's fought. Perhaps the LIBERAL-PROGRESSIVE WING OF OUR COUNTRY CAN ONLY DISH IT OUT!!!!!!!!!BUT CAN'T TAKE IT!!!!!!!!!!

By the way, the coverage of the possible shut down of the Government never touched on the fact that although a shut-down is not necessarily the best way to run things, the cost of doing so could be well BE overcome by the SAVINGS OF NOT DOING BUSINESS ON GOVERNMENT TERMS. That little thought REALLY POINTS OUT something important about the COST of GOVERNMENT DOING BUSINESS AS USUAL!!!!!!!!!!! As well as pointing up what the addition of the costs of HEALTH CARE will do to what is LEFT OF THE ECONOMY.

Or in terms of the Government should we rename the Economy, a SquanderONomy??????????

CHEERS, CONNIE