Hi,
AFTER THE FLOODS IN LOUISIANA AND THIS YEAR'S FIRES IN CALIFORNIA, I'M GOING TO RERUN THIS BLOG WITH THE HOPE THAT SOMEONE OUT THERE WILL SEE THE POSSIBILITIES OF PROFIT IN RUNNING PIPES FROM LANDS INNUNDATED WITH WATER TO BARREN LANDS GIVEN TO FIRES. IF WE CAN'T MAKE IT A HUMANITARIAN PROJECT PERHAPS WE CAN MAKE IT A PROFITABLE ONE. IT CAN'T COST ANY MORE THAN THE COST OF DEVASTATION IN THE FLOODED AND FIRE CONSUMED AREASTHAT THESE EVENTS CAUSE YEARLY.
THIS IS A RERUN OF A 2013 BLOG THAT STILL HASN'T CAUSED ANY ACTION !!!!!!!
THE EXCUSE FOR NOT LAYING A PIPE SYSTEM THAT CONDUCTS WATER FROM CONSTANTLY FLOODING AREAS TO CONSTANT DROUGHT AREAS IS CITED AS COST--MONEY IN OTHER WORDS!!!!!!!!!! BUT THOUGHT THROUGH, IT'S NOT THE MONEY !!!!!!! SO WHAT CAN IT BE ???????????????
Did you hear these reports ??? Fires in Yosemite cost $100 million dollars in damages including costs to extinguish. That alone would lay a lot of pipe!!!!! Another article stated that approval had been given for pipes to be laid for oil. And yet another article STATED more pipes were being installed for gas. NO ONE OFFERS THE COST FOR THESE "IMPROVEMENTS" ????? ONLY THAT WE AS CITIZENS WILL BE BETTER OFF !!!!!!!!!!!!
IT'S NOT THE MONEY !!!!!!!!!!!!!
BUT NO PIPES FOR FLOOD WATER TO MOVE TO AREAS COMMONLY SUFFERING FROM DROUGHT THEN FIRE !!!!!!!!!!!! SHORTSIGHTEDNESS IS A COMMON CAUSE OF THE ELECTION OF TERRIBLE CANDIDATES. SHORTSIGHTEDNESS IS A COMMON OFFICIAL CAUSE OF ALL SORTS OF DISASTERS !!!!!!!!!! HAVING OFFICIAL HEADS UP A DARK, UNSAVORY AREA DOES NOT OFFER INSIGHTS INTO REAL NEED !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
IT'S NOT THE MONEY !!!!!!!!!!!!
TOO BAD THAT ENDING THE COLLECTIVE COSTS OF DISASTER FROM FLOODING AND DROUGHT ARE NOT SEEN AS A PROFIT MOTIVE FOR CONDUCTION OF FLOOD WATERS TO DROUGHT AREAS !!!!!!!!! IT WOULD PROFIT THE COUNTRY MIGHTILY AS THE COST OF $100MILLION FOR ONE LARGE FIRE AT YOSEMITE CERTAINLY INDICATES. MANY OTHER FLOODS AND FIRES OCCUR EACH YEAR WHERE WATER HAS TO BE TAKEN BY HELICOPTERS AT A HUGE COST AND FIRE FIGHTING CREWS FLOWN IN AT ANOTHER COST OF TIME AND LIFE.
A CONSTANT DRAMA-- TOO MUCH RAIN OR SNOW IN ONE PLACE--TOO LITTLE IN ANOTHER. WE CONTINUALLY HEAR OF DROUGHT CAUSING FIRES. THE INFORMATION IS THERE FOR THOSE WHO COULD CHANGE THE COURSE OF HISTORY ???????????WHAT'S MISSING HERE ????????????
IT'S NOT THE MONEY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
YES, THERE ARE UPFRONT COSTS AS IN ANY LARGE CONSTRUCTION PROJECT. YES, THERE ARE LAND COSTS AND PROBLEMS AS IN ANY LARGE CONSTRUCTION. YES, THERE IS THE COST OF PRE-PLANNING CONSTRUCTION, LABOR EQUIPMENT, PIPES-- THE PROFIT RETURN IS IN THE FUTURE. IT WILL TAKE IMAGINATIVE THINKING AND RESTRUCTURING TO GET AT THE PROFIT REALITY. IT IS COMPARABLE TO THE VISION PRESIDENT EISENHOWER HAD WHEN HE PROVIDED AMERICA WITH THE START OF A TERRIFIC ROAD SYSTEM.
IT'S NOT THE MONEY ?????????????
SO, WHAT IS THIS BLOGGER MISSING
SAVING LAND, BUILDINGS, FORESTS WHILE STOPPING DROWNING, FLOODING AND DYING . IS THIS NOT A GOVERNMENT PROBLEM ????????????? ????????? EVEN THOUGH THE COSTS ARE HIGH, PROFIT WILL BE SEEN IN THE SAVING OF DISASTER COSTS AND ALSO IN LOWERING INSURANCE COSTS, REPLACEMENT COSTS ETC., ETC.,. ETC. !!!!!!!!!!! MAYBE THESE INSURERS SHOULD CONSIDER CHIPPING IN. THERE ARE SO MANY WAYS THE IDEA WILL OFFER A GOOD RETURN ON THE DOLLARS SPENT.
WHY IS IGNORANCE BLISS ???????????? SHOULDN'T WE BE SPENDING TAXPAYERS MONEY ON TAXPAYERS ???????????????? AT HOME !!!!!!!!!!!! INSTEAD OF PUTTING MONEY WHERE IT'S NOT APPRECIATED ???????????
LOCAL KNOWLEDGE: FLORIDA YEARLY DUMPS EXCESS WATER FROM LOW LYING LEVELS INTO THE ST. LUCIE ESTUARY AND CAUSES LOSS OF FISH AND FISHING,( A LOSS OF INCOME), CLEAN AND CLEAR WATER DISAPPEARS AND POLLUTION OCCURS!!!!!!!!!!!! CAN'T WE PIPE IT TO DRAUGHT AREAS ??????????????
WHAT IS THE COST YEARLY TO UTILITY COMPANIES IN AFFECTED AREAS OF FLOOD AND FIRE ?????????????? THAT MONEY COULD GO FOR PIPES !!!!!!!!! MAYBE THEY COULD SEE THE PROFIT MOTIVE IN REDUCING DAMAGE TO THEIR EQUIPMENT !!!!!!!!!!!!! MAYBE CHIP IN TO THE COST LIKE THE INSURERS ?? DISASTER COSTS ARE NOT NECESSARY IF PREVENTION IS PUT IN PLACE.
IT MUST BE THE MONEY BECAUSE THEY CAN'T SEE THE PROFIT FOR THE COSTS.
WHAT IS PUBLIC GOOD BY GOVERNMENT IF NOT PROVIDING THE MEANS OF PEACEFUL SURVIVAL. CERTAINLY FIRE AND FLOOD DO NOT PROVIDE PEACEFUL SURVIVAL. EVACUATIONS, EXTREME DAMAGE OR LOSS OF POSSESSIONS, FEAR AND INJURY, SCREAMING FIRE TRUCKS AND WATER BOMBING HELICOPTERS DO NOT LEND THEMSELVES TO PEACEFUL LIVING.
THE RESULTING CLEAN UP AND REPAIRS REQUIRING YEARS TO COMPLETE CERTAINLY DO NOT CREATE PEACEFUL SURVIVAL. DAMAGED NEW ORLEANS, HOMESTEAD, FLORIDA OR NEW JERSEYAND RESULTANT FIRE AND FLOODING ARE GOOD EXAMPLES. PUBLIC GOOD IS BETTER SERVED BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IF IT PROVIDES A REAL FOUNDATION FOR PREVENTION NOT JUST OVERCOMING DISASTER.
MOVING HIGH WATER TO DROUGHT AREAS IS PREVENTING DISASTER, PREVENTING FLOODING, PREVENTING FIRES !!!!!!!!! THAT IS PREVENTATIVE NATURE MEDICINE. TREAT THE CAUSE FOR DISTRUCTION RATHER THAN TREATING THE AFTERMATH. IT IS OFTEN DIFFICULT TO SEE INTRINSIC VALUE IN THIS KIND OF ACTION. BUT IT'S THERE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
IT'S NOT THE MONEY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THE HELL IT ISN'T !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
THIS BLOGGER WOULD LIKE TO THANK THE REPORTER WHO WAS INTERESTED ENOUGH AFTER THIS WAS FIRST PUBLISHED TO TALK TO SOMEONE ABOUT THIS IDEA AND WAS TOLD IT WAS "TOO EXPENSIVE"!
MAYBE A MORE CREATIVE INDIVIDUAL WOULD SEE THE PROFIT AS MONEY THAT WOULD NO LONGER HAVE TO BE SPENT ON DISASTERS OF FLOOD AND FIRE.
WHAT'S THE PROBLEM HERE ????????????
IT'S NOT THE MONEY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! BLINDNESS IS THE DISEASE AND THERE'S OFTEN NO CURE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
CHEERS, CONNIE
No comments:
Post a Comment